Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Support Canadian snark!
Syndicate
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(3428)
-
▼
May
(249)
- No, Bob, you're giving him too much credit.
- lol
- Ah, the douchebaggery of it all.
- Just when you think they can't get any stupider ...
- Dumbassitude, Sandy Crux-style.
- From the department of "Don't waste any brain cells."
- If you’re looking for sympathy – part infinity + 1.
- um... Zoink!
- Culture!
- Saturday Morning Cartoons.
- Dear Fern: Welcome to Rossholia.
- The mote in one's eye -- Stephen Harper edition.
- Instant Breakfast Dispenser
- I need a new word.
- But that's different!
- Being a conservative means perpetually making shit...
- Injustice
- Whoo hoo, we're back!
- Stockwell?
- Fuckin' Atrocity
- Canada! Cluster bombs! We're back and we rock! ...
- Heh.
- You won't look so stupid if you actually know things.
- Pardon my giggles …
- And Now, On The World Stage...
- Poor Patsy Pantload.
- If you look closely, you can notice the difference.
- Is it irresponsible to speculate wildly?
- The mote in one's eye.
- Stephen Harper: Good little Jew boy.
- The bigotry of low expectations ... for really stu...
- Dear Scott McClellan:
- Apparently, actual competence is overrated.
- Your daily "Crock o' the Matter" accomplishments.
- Dear Bell: You suck.
- The devil is in the details, you twit.
- Here's another "accomplishment" for you, Sandy.
- I got your “Accountability” right here, Big Daddy.
- Stephen Harper, you lying sack of crap.
- Nope, didn't think that one through.
- I’m outta here.
- HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
- The Blogging Tories: Ten pounds of cognitive diss...
- Your daily crock of Crux.
- C-484 Protecting Unborn TVs
- Math
- Interestinger
- Holy crap!
- Ah, the optimism of the imbecilic.
- Want to play?
- CONTEST
- Dion's Court: All Fools, No Nobles
- Just so you know what genius looks like.
- Dear Stephane: It's time for you to go.
- Denyse O'Leary: The viral blogger.
- Your "liberal" media in action.
- That’s just icky.
- Sometimes, this job is too easy.
- Stephen Harper: "Accomplishments" and fuck-ups.
- It seemed like a good idea at the time.
- There's obsessive, and then there's ...
- Sunday Funnies.
- It's Sunday: Time to kill someone's kids.
- Smoosh
- Leave him alone, LuLu. I'm serious.
- Well ... that’s not very Christian.
- Is it just me ...
- Sandy would tell you, but then she'd have to kill ...
- Retardopedia redux.
- And in some alternate universe, Denyse O'Leary is ...
- Saturday Morning Cartoons.
- Only the names have been changed to protect the te...
- Your irony du jour.
- Play time, boys and girls.
- The train wreck that is Hillary Clinton.
- Ew, ew, ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwww.
- Oh my.
- The Peter Principle, taken to really creepy extremes.
- In Memoriam.
- Beer, beer, beer, beer ...
- Document the atrocities.
- You know it's biking season when ...
- Matt Bin and American war resisters.
- Sometimes, they're right by accident.
- It's still stupid ...
- To Boldly Cower...
- 'Cos
- Support the $#**&$^%#@# troops.
- Touché indeed.
- Frankerotica, small-calibre style.
- The embarrassment that is Dr. Roy.
- I guess that's what you call "proof."
- There are no words ...
- Beyond incoherent and thoroughly into delusional.
- And speaking of ANWR ...
- Simple answers to simple questions.
- I love the smell of whiny, snivelling, petulant fe...
- So, yeah, that's a reasonable reaction.
- The stupid! It burns!
- Ken Epp's Big Con
-
▼
May
(249)
6 comments:
Good pick. This one’s a classic.
By the way, for whatever it’s worth, a lot of us would never have seen most of these old WB cartoons if not for the “Bugs Bunny, Road Runner Hour” that preceded “Hockey Night in Canada” on CBC many, many years ago.
That evil CBC…
I've always loved the "Mexican Hat Dance" scene. Bugs Bunny is delightfully twisted ... no wonder the CBC carried it (they're obviously the Devil's network).
It’s kind of funny when you delve into the murky realm of “people with too much time on their hands” who speculate as to the sexual orientation of Bugs and/or attempt to impress their own bizarre sociological concoctions on these things. Personally, I think his appeal comes from the fact that he’s “sassy” and delightfully anti-authoritarian.
Really doesn't matter much about his sexual orientation. Poor lil' dude has no genitals and a mouth that precludes performing oral sex.
If one wishes to spend one's time in pointless speculation on the sexual orientation of fictional characters, far better to waste it on speculating on Christ's sexual orientation. At least that way your speculation has the productive effect of greatly pissing off people.
Um ... some dude who hung out with a dozen other guys all wearing loose-fitting robes for easy access? Not a lot of room for speculation there.
"We're sorry, this video is no longer available."
???
Post a Comment